About free downloads
I do not want to address the issue of illegal downloads, but i would like here to focus on the download of music for which, that’s my choice, the authors have chosen to make them available through a free download.
The main question is why should an artist should make his music available for free download?
It seems to me that we must first understand that the first contact between an auditor, potential buyer, and a song or an album is generally a free contact, via the mass media as radio, TV, or through a friend who makes discovering the music he loves.
For an independant musician as i am, who do not have access to mass media, the internet allows this first meeting between an auditor, the public and potential buyer, and its music. A pre-listening to 30s is far from sufficient to create a familiarity between the world of the artist and the listener. The free download can solve this problem by giving the downloader time enough to go into an intimacy with the artist. Once this proximity will exist, eventually, it will be turned into a deed of purchase for this song, this album, or even a ticket concert.
But it is essential that the free download can help to create a link between the artist and the person who downloaded his music. And there’s the rub. Indeed, the download sites “legal” never offer the opportunity for artists to see who downloaded their music, and thereafter maintain contacts, send information, news, etc. ….
And in a way, in good faith, the sites of legal free download turn to make music anonymous, transforms it into a good massively used, but independent of the artist, and ultimately prevent the development of new artists.
So what can we do?
This is the solution that i have chosen :
1) limit to the minimum delivering my music on the free download sites. The few times I do, it is trying to steer people toward my personal website
2) start a system of free download to discover my albums, asking people to come back later to pay if he wishes. For this, I ask for people who want to download my album to commit to minimum, and leave their email. This will allow to go back to them a few days after they downloaded, to remind them to buy the album if they choose to. It will allow too to send them regular information about my news.
The results of this practice is the following:
* 1 out of 5 who comes to the site goes to the page dedicated to the downloading
* 1 in 3 of those coming on the download page, where it is discovered that one must leave his email before downloading, will actually download the album.
Therefore, I infer that I roughly divided by 3 the number of downloads of my albums but i get a file for my email newsletter, which precious to create and maintain a relationship with people who appreciate my music.
And in the end, how much to pay?
As far as I am concerned, this is difficult to quantify like that. Indeed I offer the possibility of supporting my productions in two ways : by paying albums downloaded, or by making a promotion on the web, via a blog, a forum or another.
In addition, a number of people who have downloaded the album and have not paid, are the same that regularly attend my concerts online on Second Life and financially support me in this occasion.
So roughly, I would say that I return in terms of financial and other kind of support from about half of the people who have downloaded my albums free from my site, which is not so bad regarding the RadioHead experience talking about 1 on 3..
A balance therefore rather positive free download offered within this framework. A good thing would be that all the sites that offer opportunities for free downloading of music should adopt a similar policy and ask people to provide an email before downloading anything, email to be forwarded to the artist concerned. This is a way to give value to the free music. Everyone gives, on the one hand the artist who offers her work, and on the other hand the downloader who engages himself in a relationship with the author of the music he wants to download.






